Cette conférence, organisée par le LexTech Institute, vise à explorer les mécanismes de résolution des litiges sur les plateformes de médias sociaux. Ces plateformes, conçues comme des espaces d’interactions où s’échange rapidement l’information, génèrent de nombreux litiges qu’il faut résoudre par le biais de moyens innovants, rapides et équitables.
Lors de cette journée, nous examinerons comment la résolution des litiges s’est adaptée aux défis posés par les médias sociaux, en mettant l’accent sur les droits humains, les garanties procédurales, les approches législatives et sur l’utilisation de la justice décentralisée dans la modération des contenus. En tant que plateforme d’échange pluridisciplinaire, cette conférence offre une occasion unique de réfléchir au rôle qu’ont à jouer les plateformes de médias sociaux et les législateurs dans la régulation de la parole en ligne.
Human Rights and Dispute Resolution on Social Media Platforms
- Meta Oversight Board: A new Human Rights tribunal in town?
- Content moderation as dispute resolution: Are Human Rights an efficient framework for the regulation of Social Media platforms?
- The relationship between States and Social Media platforms in balancing freedom of expression online
Procedural Guarantees in Social Media Platform Dispute Resolution (Part 1)
- Due process in online content moderation: Between speed and fairness
- Algorithmic content moderation: The right to a human in the loop
- Mapping social justice organisations’ perspectives on online harms and access to justice
Procedural Guarantees in Social Media Platform Dispute Resolution (Part 2)
- Moderated by Pietro Ortolani | Professor @ Faculty of Law of Radboud University Contestation of internal moderation decisions under the Digital Services Act (DSA)
- The platforms’ perspective on the implementation of DSA-compliant internal content moderation mechanisms
- The regulation of large communication platforms in Switzerland
Discussion about Procedural Guarantees in Social Media Platform Dispute Resolution
Decentralized Justice as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Social Medias
- Decentralized Justice as an evolution of online dispute resolution and its applicability to disputes on Social Medias
- Would Decentralized Justice produce fair decisions for disputes on Social Medias?
- Kleros Moderate: Decentralized Social Media moderation in practice
Discussion about the need for Decentralized Justice in Blockchain Governance and its Applicability to Disputes on Social Medias
Florence Guillaume | Professor @ Faculty of Law of the University of Neuchâtel | Founder of the LexTech Institute
Anja von Rosenstiel | Lecturer @ Boston University School of Law
Sabrina Ahmad | Senior Case Screening Officer @ the Meta Oversight Board
Marie-Caroline Arreto | Lecturer @ Institut Catholique de Paris
Sophie Weerts | Professor @ Faculty of Law of the University of Lausanne
Pietro Ortolani | Professor @ Faculty of Law of Radboud University
Emmanuel Vargas | PhD Candidate @ Faculty of Law of the Örebro University
Naomi Appelman | PhD Candidate @ Institute for Information Law of the University of Amsterdam
Thibault Douville | Professor @ Faculty of Law of the University of Caen Normandie
Emmanuel Netter | Professor @ Faculty of Law of the University of Strasbourg
Jonathan Bory | Lecturer @ Faculty of Law of the University of Neuchâtel | Fellow @ LexTech Institute
Leonel Constantino Ferreira | PhD Candidate @ Faculty of Law of the University of Neuchâtel | Fellow @ LexTech Institute
Helen Winter | Professor @ Pepperdine Caruso School of Law
Bruno Deffains | Professor @ University of Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas
Federico Ast | CEO @ Kleros